GCSE Jeopardy and the Difficulty with Second Chances

If we were to design an assessment system focused on maximising learning, we wouldn’t create a Key Stage 3 "No Man’s Land" followed by the high-stakes pressure of GCSE jeopardy. Yet, this is precisely the experience many students face in today’s education system — a period of inconsistent focus in the early years of secondary …

Continue reading GCSE Jeopardy and the Difficulty with Second Chances

The quest for standardisation in shared assessments

Fifteen school data leads convene, bringing together their Heads of Science, English, History, and Maths to create shared end-of-year assessments in these four subjects. What's the impetus behind this collaborative effort? The performance of a subject department is often inferred by comparing the knowledge and skills of their students against a benchmark—usually other students. However, …

Continue reading The quest for standardisation in shared assessments

Which came first: The knowledge architecture beliefs or the assessment?

Do you write your class assessments to suit your subject’s curriculum and its knowledge architecture? Or do you shape your visions of knowledge architecture to reflect your subject’s assessment tradition? Classroom practice is often described by educationalists as a three-legged stool comprising curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Three-legged stools are exceptionally stable, provided each of the …

Continue reading Which came first: The knowledge architecture beliefs or the assessment?

Incentivising mastery in primary maths

In my last post, I explained how KS2 maths SATs can encourage students who struggle with maths to chase marks in periphery topics, rather than improve arithmetic understanding and fluency which is necessary for the study of secondary mathematics. In this post, I’m going to reflect on how we might manipulate accountability to do the …

Continue reading Incentivising mastery in primary maths

The limited uses of question level analysis

Yesterday, Adam Robbins posted on Twitter an excellent thread about assessment that included this comment on Question Level Analysis (QLA). It's easy to say that QLA generally isn't a good idea (and I used to say this), but I keep encountering teachers who insist that they find analysing individual questions on a test helpful! My …

Continue reading The limited uses of question level analysis

Writing the rules of the grading game (part III): There is no value-neutral approach to giving feedback

These three blogs (part I, part II, part III here) are based on a talk I gave at Headteachers' Roundtable Summit in March 2019. My thoughts on this topic have been extensively shaped by conversations with Ben White, a psychology teacher in Kent. Neither of us yet know what we think! Our beliefs about our …

Continue reading Writing the rules of the grading game (part III): There is no value-neutral approach to giving feedback

Writing the rules of the grading game (part II): The games children play

These three blogs (part I, part II here, part III) are based on a talk I gave at Headteachers' Roundtable Summit in March 2019. My thoughts on this topic have been extensively shaped by conversations with Ben White, a psychology teacher in Kent. Neither of us yet know what we think! The two fundamental jobs …

Continue reading Writing the rules of the grading game (part II): The games children play

Writing the rules of the grading game (part I): The grade changes the child

These three blogs (part I here, part II, part III) are based on a talk I gave at Headteachers' Roundtable Summit in March 2019. My thoughts on this topic have been extensively shaped by conversations with Ben White, a psychology teacher in Kent. Neither of us yet know what we think! Teachers are rarely trained …

Continue reading Writing the rules of the grading game (part I): The grade changes the child